I'm in the process of determining which I want to keep, and which I want to sell. I actuallly have both now, but only want to keep on, so. Today, I decided to do a little unscientific 'test' of the tracking of each. Here's the scenario. Both watches on same arm, separated by about an inch. AW lower, F5x a little farther up the arm.
Both allowed to 'soak' the position for about 5 minutes before starting the activity I used an app 'Work Outdoors' to enable exportable mapping on the Apple Watch. Here is a direct comparison file from 'My GPS Files' showing both tracks on the same map. I know which I feel is the 'better' track, but would like opinions as to what others think. I tried to make all things equal, but as I said, this is not a truly scientific, controlled test, but an informal walk with both devices on the same arm, same dat, same path, etc. That's a tough call. If I had to pick one, I'd say that when they diverge, the orange line is closer to the streets than the purple one slightly more often, but it's close enough that if it were me, I'd make my decision on which one to keep on other factors (style, battery life, other functionality, etc).
At any rate, I'd probably keep them both for a few more runs to see if you see any clear winner emerges over time. I'd pretty much call it a draw from that one run. Edit: I just saw that the orange one is the apple watch 7 the purple the Garmin. I also noticed that one of them had the workout as 2 and a half minutes longer than the other run.
Fenix 2 for Twitter For PC can be easily installed and used on a desktop computer or laptop running Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows 10 and a Macbook, iMac running Mac OS X. This will be done using an Android emulator. Doesn't Mac OS X have a built-in static web server already, just put HTML/CSS files into ~/Sites/ folder and they work on What's the difference. Available for Windows and Mac. Fenix is for developers and designers working with static sites. CommandManage Fenix from the command line.
I'd probably go with whatever one was closer to the actual time, with that much divergence (or take a third, non-smart watch next time (in a pocket, so you don't look like a total dork) and see which one is tracking exercise time more accurately. That's a tough call. If I had to pick one, I'd say that when they diverge, the orange line is closer to the streets than the purple one slightly more often, but it's close enough that if it were me, I'd make my decision on which one to keep on other factors (style, battery life, other functionality, etc). At any rate, I'd probably keep them both for a few more runs to see if you see any clear winner emerges over time. I'd pretty much call it a draw from that one run.
Edit: I just saw that the orange one is the apple watch 7 the purple the Garmin. I also noticed that one of them had the workout as 2 and a half minutes longer than the other run. I'd probably go with whatever one was closer to the actual time, with that much divergence (or take a third, non-smart watch next time (in a pocket, so you don't look like a total dork) and see which one is tracking exercise time more accurately. Click to expand.Very interesting though, the accuracy is comparable and as you probably know there is very little likelihood of two even identical units producing the same graph - I've explained thus to runners at the office who went out together with the same Garmin units that showed quite different results. For a basic fix 4, not 3 of the GPS satellites must be in good reception for the unit and most chipsets will sample from many more in the sky at that time. 2 different units, however, may lock onto different birds in the constellation with different positions and therefore different angles between them plus weather patterns effect the speed of signal reception and accuacy on some of these - this means you will always see some variance. It is, therefore, pretty impressive that these 2 units dissimilar are performing as close as they are.
Very interesting though, the accuracy is comparable and as you probably know there is very little likelihood of two even identical units producing the same graph - I've explained thus to runners at the office who went out together with the same Garmin units that showed quite different results. For a basic fix 4, not 3 of the GPS satellites must be in good reception for the unit and most chipsets will sample from many more in the sky at that time. 2 different units, however, may lock onto different birds in the constellation with different positions and therefore different angles between them plus weather patterns effect the speed of signal reception and accuacy on some of these - this means you will always see some variance. It is, therefore, pretty impressive that these 2 units dissimilar are performing as close as they are. Click to expand.Wow, I didn't think of the fact that the sats are moving, and the devices are constantly polling for the best sat array, that would certainly explain a lot. Yeah, I'm pretty satisfied with the AW, I'm not a marathoner, just an old man that does try to stay active, doing walks, some bike rides, and gym classes. Never need to have something that will last more than a day, as since I'm retired, I can charge in the mornings when I'm doing my coffee, and internet stuff.
Fenix Mackolik
I am really surprised that the AW has the GPS tracks that it does though. To me, takes it out of the realm of 'toy' into an actual fitness device.
It really is a matter of whether you prefer a pure sports watch that happens to have some smartwatch capability or a pure smartwatch that also has fitness capability. I have had a S0 and S3 Apple Watch and have had the Fenix 2, 3, 3HR, and now 5 Plus. I currently own the Fenix 5 Plus and S3 Apple Watch. The Fenix is not terribly good as a smartwatch companion for iOS. The Apple Watch is not great for more involved workouts. If you want a great smartwatch that does a decent job of tracking fitness, then I'd go with the Apple Watch.
If you want a fitness watch that can give you in depth, real-time analysis of your workouts, and be capable of long workouts, then the Fenix is the way to go. For me, it is the Fenix for any sort of working out, and the Apple Watch for day to day. Although, even that is starting to change as I begin to question what having instant, always-on notifications is doing to me as a person, and whether the notifications are actually useful or an unnecessary distraction. It really is a matter of whether you prefer a pure sports watch that happens to have some smartwatch capability or a pure smartwatch that also has fitness capability.
I have had a S0 and S3 Apple Watch and have had the Fenix 2, 3, 3HR, and now 5 Plus. I currently own the Fenix 5 Plus and S3 Apple Watch. The Fenix is not terribly good as a smartwatch companion for iOS.
The Apple Watch is not great for more involved workouts. If you want a great smartwatch that does a decent job of tracking fitness, then I'd go with the Apple Watch. If you want a fitness watch that can give you in depth, real-time analysis of your workouts, and be capable of long workouts, then the Fenix is the way to go. For me, it is the Fenix for any sort of working out, and the Apple Watch for day to day. Although, even that is starting to change as I begin to question what having instant, always-on notifications is doing to me as a person, and whether the notifications are actually useful or an unnecessary distraction.
Click to expand.For me, it's a double edged sword. As a retired network administrator, I'm a hopeless geek.
Hopelessly in love with data, what it says, and how to play with it. On the other hand, I'm also a person who absolutely loves maps, and what they can tell me. But, I also am a 70 year old man who knows that I'll never compete in a 5k, 10k, or anything approaching any kind of race, as my knees just don't work anymore like they should. Also, 35 years + of smoking, and being well over 300 pounds at one point, I realize I'll not 'intensively train' for anything. However, I DO now appreciate living a healthy lifestyle, lost over a hundred of those pounds, and enjoy the walks, bike rides, silver sneakers classes at the gym, and occasional weight (well, the machines) training at the gym. I realize the F5x is way overkill, but man, the data.!
Fenix Machinery Inc
I realize also for me, the most logical choice would be the Apple watch, and it can produce just about all the data I can handle, and I can export that data using RunGap into Garmin Connect, or Suunto's Movescount, and have almost everything the Garmin will give me. I think, for me, if Apple had a website where I could see ALL the data in one place, all day heart rate, sleep info, exercise/activity info, there simply wouldn't be a question. I'm leaning toward the Apple watch, just because it's probably for me, the most sensible choice, but then, I look at the 5x, and feel sorry for it.sigh.
I do enjoy the apps that the AW gives, and the convenience of being able to check my bank balance (when there is one) or having music at the gym without having to have the phone, among many other little niceities that the AW provides. I really appreciate the ability to speak a return text like when I'm driving. Okay, thanks for the input everyone, one of these days I'll make my decision, and hopefully stick with it. Click to expand.I've been wanting this for a long time now. Right now, all the information stays on the iPhone. Can't do too much with that tiny screen. I totally know what you mean about being a data geek.
Hell, I used to export out the data from my iPod nano into Excel to plot out my running speeds and HR to compare from run to run. Totally useless, but it was strangely satisfying when the charts lined up. Anyway, Apple could easily allow for the user to publish the data to iCloud and create a new 'app' on iCloud.com to analyze the workout data more easily. I don't think they'll ever do it, and even if they did, they would likely use the 'Apple-Style' line graphs which are pretty useless. We should do some consulting work for them and come up with a great concept to unlock the data onto iCloud. It's a winner.
You all are making good sense, and I'm adult enough to realize that while I'd like to envision myself doing a 50 mile run, or 100 mile bike ride, it simply ain't gonna happen. I think I've made my decision, just ordered a super nice looking Manta Ray skin strap for the 'dressier' occasions, we'll see how that looks when it gets here. I have to admit that in the last month or so, my 'rings' calendar look horrible; I'll wear the AW for a week, put the Fenix back on, and in 3 days I'm back to the AW, trying another full week of all 3.sigh. The AGONY! You all are making good sense, and I'm adult enough to realize that while I'd like to envision myself doing a 50 mile run, or 100 mile bike ride, it simply ain't gonna happen. I think I've made my decision, just ordered a super nice looking Manta Ray skin strap for the 'dressier' occasions, we'll see how that looks when it gets here.
I have to admit that in the last month or so, my 'rings' calendar look horrible; I'll wear the AW for a week, put the Fenix back on, and in 3 days I'm back to the AW, trying another full week of all 3.sigh. The AGONY! Click to expand.I have been using RunGap, and really do like it, because I absolutely love the ability to export the data to other platforms. For me, for the pure data of the activities, I've found that Suunto's Movescount gives me the best data picture, including Peak Training Effect, and EPOC. No recovery though, but through experience I generally can figure out what my approximate recovery times are.
Phoenix Macos
Here's an example of an activity that was exported from Apple's Health into Movescount, using RunGap: And the same activity imported into Garmin Connect, using RunGap 'Told ya I was a data freak!'